 |
cj.myfreeforum.org NEWS, views, prophecy, dreams
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
CJ Site Admin

Joined: 22 Sep 2009 Posts: 10183
|
Posted: Wed Dec 01, 2010 6:57 am Post subject: Republican sellout begins |
|
|
Republican sellout begins
Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.
Republicans couldn't really be this stupid, could they?
Unless House Majority Leader-designate Eric Cantor was thoroughly misquoted by Politico, which is entirely possible, the Republican sellout has already begun.
Just four weeks after the American people gave Republicans their biggest sweep of the House in modern history, the new House leadership is not only planning compromise with the hated Obamacare law, they are announcing it publicly!
Instead of scrapping the entire abomination because it is unconstitutional and counterproductive for Washington to attempt to manage individual health-care decisions or make policy for 300 million of us, Cantor, who presumably speaks for GOP leadership in the House, says he wants to keep the "good" provisions of Obamacare.
Like what?
* Barring insurance companies from refusing coverage to patients with a pre-existing condition;
* Allowing young people to stay on their parents' insurance plans until age 26.
Now, I know there were Republicans pushing these ideas before Obamacare was enacted. The question now is why?
Where in the Constitution does it suggest Congress has the power to bar companies from offering certain kinds of services?
Where in the Constitution does it suggest sick people have a right to buy health insurance without regard to their condition?
Where in the Constitution does it suggest Congress has the power to decide arbitrarily how long parents can insure their adult children?
Don't miss Joseph Farah's newest book, "The Tea Party Manifesto: A Vision of American Rebirth," in which he sets out a clear agenda for the movement he predicted would arise in response to Barack Obama.
If all this is constitutional, so is Obamacare. There is little moral or legal distinction. And that's the can of worms Cantor and company opened. The new Congress should get its own fiscal house in order before even thinking about making policy for America's private insurance industry and for individual Americans' health-care needs.
It's just that simple.
Republicans haven't learned the real lesson of the last election.
We don't want socialism-lite.
We want American government to get back to the constitutional covenant it has with the people and the states.
Remember, this is the same Republican leadership that pledged to examine the constitutional legitimacy of every piece of legislation it considered. So how about these ideas? Why put them on the table without considering the constitutionality? If Republicans have already determined it is constitutionally acceptable to place mandates on private health-care companies, they should immediately announce how they arrived at that conclusion.
I, for one, would be very interested in the methodology used in that analysis.
Now let's examine the practicality of this proposed bailout of Obamacare.
We all know what Barack Obama sought to achieve with his health-care initiatives. As he announced to us, he wanted to bankrupt the insurance industry to arrive at the panacea of a single-payer system in which government is the single payer.
I had assumed all along that Republicans opposed Obamacare not only because it was unconstitutional but because it ultimately led to socialism and tyranny.
Republicans don't mind bankrupting the private insurance industry by placing unworkable mandates on them.
Think about this. Why doesn't the federal government mandate that homeowner's insurance cover destruction of the home before the policy goes into effect?
They don't do it for two reasons:
* It's unconstitutional and the Congress has no power to do it;
* because it makes no sense and would quickly bankrupt the insurers.
So why don't Cantor and company see the illogic and illegitimacy of what they are proposing? Could they be that blind? Or are they that disingenuous?
Do they really think this is what we voted for last month? Do they really think we want halfway measures and compromise from them?
Tea party, it's time to arise again.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=234753
. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mayito7777
Joined: 03 May 2010 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Wed Dec 01, 2010 7:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Unless the heart of the American nation changes, we are just replacing a dying pig with another almost as dead, Republican leaders and democrat leaders are the same they dont care about the American people except in election times, that is why I am an Independent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BornAgain2
Joined: 12 Dec 2009 Posts: 9682
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"sellout" is an understatement...
Here's a recent yahoo reuter's article on the Senate blocking the "compromise" bill over the Bush-era tax cuts...
| Quote: | http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101204/ap_on_bi_ge/us_senate_tax_vote
WASHINGTON – Senate Republicans have blocked legislation allowing taxes to rise on upper income taxpayers on Jan. 1.
The vote Saturday was 53-36 — seven short of the 60 needed to advance the measure.
Without action by Congress, all income tax cuts enacted when George W. Bush was president will expire at year's end. The legislation backed by Senate Democrats would have kept the cuts in effect except on incomes over $200,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples.
The Senate vote is expected to clear the way for negotiations between the White House and Republicans to resume on a bill to extend the tax cuts at all levels.
Any agreement is also expected to renew expiring jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed.
|
Here's an article for a couple of days prior on the House coming up with the "compromise" initially before the Senate voted(and struck it down)...
| Quote: | Speaker Pelosi gaveled the vote to a close herself, receiving a smattering of applause from Democratic members. The bill extends only the cuts for the middle-class, letting tax breaks end for families earning more than $250,000 per year and individuals making more than $200,000. Congress originally authorized the cuts in 2001 and 2003.
Three Republicans, Walter Jones (N.C.), Ron Paul (Texas) and John Duncan (Tenn.), voted with Democrats to renew only the middle-class cuts. |
What the Yahoo article did NOT mention is that the "compromise" bill kept the Bush-era tax cuts for the middle class, but the rates would be raised back up again for the $200K+ earners.
Yah - pretty much, while the GOP pretty much had an outward showing that they blocked this compromise bill of the $200K earners getting their rates raised, what they pretty much did is block this bill which pretty much ENDS the Bush-era tax cuts. Read the 2 articles carefully above.
You gotta love the fake left/right paradigm!
[/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|