cj.myfreeforum.org Forum Index cj.myfreeforum.org
NEWS, prophecy, dreams, ZionsCRY, Bible, teaching, visions
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Saudi Arabia * GCC * UAE
Page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 24, 25, 26  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    cj.myfreeforum.org Forum Index -> ISRAEL and MidEast NEWS
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
CJ
Site Admin


Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32219



PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:55 am    Post subject:  Reply with quote

Egypt Ceding Islands to Saudi Arabia
Oct 10, 2016
-  An Egyptian court held its first hearing on a government appeal against a lower court ruling in June that rescinded an agreement to hand over control of two key Red Sea islands to Saudi Arabia.  The islands of Tiran and Sanafir belonged to Egypt.  Saudi Arabia had only temporarily handed over control of the Islands to Egypt in 1950, fearing they would be attacked by Israel.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/...-ceding-islands-Saudi-Arabia.html
http://africa.tvcnews.tv/2016/10/...peals-ceding-islands-saudi-arabia
http://www.arabnews.com/node/995701/saudi-arabia
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3478593/posts
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
BornAgain2



Joined: 12 Dec 2009
Posts: 17194



PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 2:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EXCLUSIVE: Saudi Arabia Is Astroturfing America To Roll Back 9/11 Law Via @dailycaller
Eric OwensEducation Editor
12/5/16

5361155

The government of Saudi Arabia and its agents appear to be recruiting U.S. military veterans and people with foreign policy credentials to submit basically the same op-ed to newspapers around the country in an effort to concoct the appearance of an organic groundswell of opposition to a new federal law that allows civil lawsuits against state sponsors of terrorism.

The law — the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA) — creates a way for American citizens to file civil claims against foreign governments for deaths, injuries and other damage related to terrorist acts if the foreign governments financed those attacks.

The immediate effect of the new legislation is to allow a group of plaintiffs to proceed in a longstanding lawsuit against the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The plaintiffs point to evidence that the Saudi government partially financed the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, which killed 2,996 people.

A cursory review of five different newspaper submissions allegedly written by five different authors — and placed in five different major newspapers from Oct. 5, 2016 to Nov. 28, 2016 — strongly suggests an astroturf campaign conducted by some single source.
Examining the astroturf

All five op-eds use exactly the same language at different points, with full paragraphs that are clearly, almost lazily repetitive.

Below, for instance, is a Nov. 4 op-ed in The Tennessean, Nashville’s primary newspaper, entitled “JASTA will harm our soldiers and diplomats overseas.” The author is Air Force Major Gen. (Ret.) William Russell Cotney.

   “The principle known as sovereign immunity has governed relations between states for centuries. It holds that governments cannot be sued for civil wrongs without their consent. In international relations, it preserves the right and responsibility of governments to settle disputes with other governments on behalf of their citizens.”

And here is Angela Sinkovits, described as “an attorney and was a medical specialist in the U.S. Army,” writing in The Denver Post on Oct. 5:

   “The principle of sovereign immunity has governed relations between states for centuries. It holds that governments cannot be sued for civil wrongs without their consent. In international relations, it preserves the right and responsibility of governments to settle disputes with other governments on behalf of their citizens.”

Only the word “of” instead of the phrase “known as” separates what Sinkovits wrote from what Cotney wrote. Otherwise, 46 words — out of 47 and 48, respectively — are identical.

But wait. There’s more. On Nov. 28, the Cedar Rapids Gazette published an op-ed titled “JASTA’s negative consequences” by “guest columnist” Don Pugsley with exactly the same string of 47 words contained in the Oct. 5 op-ed in The Denver Post by Sinkovits.

The Gazette describes Pugsley as “a special forces Green Beret Sargeant [sic] Major with 87 military parachute jumps, a top Secret Security Clearance and a medi-vac in Vietnam.”

In the Concord Monitor on Nov. 20, a letter to the editor by Ken Georgevits — no description given — changes three words but is otherwise a carbon copy of the identical wording by Cotney, Sinkovits and Pugsley.

On Oct. 27, the Miami Herald published an op-ed by Paul Crespo entitled “Congress must revisit flawed 9/11 lawsuit law.” Slightly to his credit, Crespo appears to have taken some time to paraphrase the language a bit:

   “Sovereign immunity has been a bedrock principle governing relations between states for five centuries. It holds that governments cannot be sued for civil wrongs without their consent. It preserves the right of governments to settle disputes with other governments on behalf of their citizens.”

The Herald describes Crespo as “president and CEO of Spectre Global Risk, an international security consulting firm” as well as “a former officer in the U.S. Marine Corps” and a former Defense Intelligence Agency attaché.

There is much more evidence of a planned astroturfing campaign in the five allegedly different op-ed pieces published in five different major newspapers.

In a second instance, both Pugsley — the “special forces Green Beret” writing in The Cedar Rapids Gazette — and Cotney — the retired Air Force major general writing in The Tennessean — appear to present this entire, 47-word paragraph as something they did not plagiarize but composed by themselves:

   “No nation wants this. In fact, several countries have raised their deep concerns about JASTA with the United States government, including the Gulf Cooperation Council, the European Union, the Netherlands, Turkey and Pakistan — countries where many thousands of U.S. servicemen and women are or have been present.”

Crespo, writing in the Miami Herald, wrote exactly the same thing substantively and used many of the same words. However, he at least appeared to have changed things up a bit.

The five writers use virtually the same — or exactly the same — words to make their arguments in several other instances.

Pugsley in the Cedar Rapids Gazette, Cotney in The Tennessean, Sinkovits in The Denver Post and Crespo in the Miami Herald all managed to produce a similar variation of a sentence obviously sourced from the same original document:

   “Whether the allegations have merit or not is immaterial; what matters is that they would be subject to local courts — not just in Canada or Germany, but even potentially in places like Pakistan, Russia or Venezuela.”

In all of the instances of similarity, Cotney and Pugsley — the op-ed writers most reliant on their military credentials — appear to have been the laziest in their reproduction of the original document.

For example, here’s Pugsley in The Gazette claiming that there is no evidence that Saudi Arabia participated in the Sept. 11 terror attacks:

   “Remember, there is no evidence that the government of Saudi Arabia was complicit in the attacks of 9/11, yet the families want to bring suit against it.”

And here’s Cotney in The Tennessean:

   “Remember, and as much as some wish were the case, there is no solid evidence the government of Saudi Arabia was complicit in the attacks of 9/11.”

In addition to the lazy similarity in their op-eds, Pugsley and Cotney are also flatly wrong about the lack of evidence against Saudi Arabia.

This summer, well before the two ex-military men presented the op-eds to major newspapers as their own, the U.S. Congress released 28 pages of a congressional inquiry. These 28 pages produce solid evidence showing Saudi Arabia’s involvement in the Sept. 11 attacks.

The official inquiry by Congress states that the September 11 hijackers “received support and assistance from” “Saudi intelligence officers.” “A [deleted], dated July 2, 2002,” suggests “incontrovertible evidence that there is support for these terrorists inside the Saudi Government,” the congressional finding says.
The source of the astroturf

Who coordinated the five impressively identical op-eds allegedly written by five different authors in five different major newspapers in the last two months? The obvious candidate — the only candidate, really — is a lobbyist or a public relations firm working on a large retainer for Saudi Arabia.

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia appears to be the only foreign government named in any lawsuit alleging material foreign-government support for the Sept. 11 hijackers. The practical effect of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act has been to allow lawsuits to go forward against Saudi Arabia because of 9/11.

In response to the 9/11 law (now and when it was a bill), the Saudi government has been engaging in a furious lobbying effort.

As of early November, The Hill reports, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is paying 14 lobbying firms to convince Congress to change the law — and thus to prevent any federal trial in which Saudi Arabia must defend itself.

The 14 lobbying firms include public-relations big guns such as Squire Patton Boggs, Podesta Group and Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck.

Fees are exorbitant. As of October, Saudi Arabia was paying American lobbyists and public relations firms $1.3 million each month to fight against the right of Americans to sue terror-financing nations, according to The Hill.

Last year, the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia paid DLA Piper, a huge law firm, $450,000 for just nine months of work to “assist the Embassy in strengthening the ability of the United States and Saudi Arabia to advance mutual national security interests,” according to The Washington Post.

The fact that this multitude of lobbyists is working on behalf of Saudi Arabia is public knowledge because firms working with foreign governments must disclose their work in a U.S. Justice Department database. (Other firms on retainer with Saudi Arabia include Sphere Consulting and Glover Park Group.)
‘An absolute betrayal’

Congress enacted the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act on Sept. 28, 2016 after the House voted 348 to 77 to override a veto by President Barack Obama. (The Senate had previously voted to override Obama by a 97-to-1 vote.)

Terry Strada, a widow and the national chair for the 9/11 Families & Survivors United for Justice Against Terrorists, spoke to The Daily Caller about her group’s continuing effort to sue the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in federal court.

“It is the Saudi talking points that these people are publishing,” Strada told TheDC.

The five people who signed their names to op-eds containing impressively large chunks of the same words were likely contacted by people they know and trust, she suggested.

“I think they are approached and agree to put their name on the op-ed. The lobbying firms and communications firms reach out to the individuals,” Strada said.

“But you are doing it for the government of Saudi Arabia,” she added. “This is Saudi Arabia trying to dictate our laws and that is frightening. That just can’t happen. You can’t let Saudi Arabia pull the strings in our legislative process.”

“We want the right to present our evidence in a U.S. courtroom, just like anyone else,” Strada said.

“This is Washington, D.C. at its worst,” Strada also said. “We are counting on President-elect Trump to continue his support for the law.”

During his presidential campaign, now-President-elect Trump expressed vigorous support for the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act in its current form.

Hillary Clinton also said she supports the law as it stands, according to CNN.

Last week, two Republican senators, John McCain and Lindsey Graham, proposed an amendment to the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act. The amendment would only allow Americans to sue foreign governments for damages related to terrorist attacks if the foreign nations “knowingly engage with a terrorist organization directly or indirectly, including financing,” reports Politico.

Strada and other proponents of the legislation as it is currently written believe the amendment would effectively make the law meaningless.

“Senator Graham is now stabbing the 9/11 families in the back. He and Senator McCain are seeking to torpedo JASTA by imposing changes demanded by Saudi Arabia’s lobbyists,” the 9/11 widow said in a statement sent to TheDC. “We have reviewed the language, and it is an absolute betrayal.”

http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/05...ing-america-to-roll-back-911-law/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CJ
Site Admin


Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32219



PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 2:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Twisted Evil   Limpdick Graham is horrible!
He used to be OK but he's become EVIL.
Send them to DC, they get involved in wickedness.
O GOD - CLEAN IT UP!
HELP PRESIDENT TRUMP DRAIN THAT SWAMP!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
CJ
Site Admin


Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32219



PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2016 8:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Egypt to give islands to Saudi Arabia
Dec 30, 2016
debka  -  Cairo approves handover of strategic islands to Saudi Arabia.  Egypt government gave permission for the transfer of sovereignty over 2 Red Sea islands to Saudi Arabia. Cairo and Riyadh had reached an agreement in April for the handover of Tiran and Sanafir, located in the Tiran Strait at the southern tip of the Gulf of Aqaba. However, the transfer was delayed due to an appeal.  The Egyptian parliament will now vote on whether to ratify the agreement.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
CJ
Site Admin


Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32219



PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Safe zones in Syria and Yemen
Jan 30, 2017  
-   President Donald Trump and Saudi Arabia King Salman spoke by phone. They agreed to create safe zones in Syria and Yemen, a dramatic departure from the former policy.  The Saudi King agreed to support and finance safe zones in Syria and Yemen, as well as supporting other ideas to help the many refugees who are displaced. This is a big, big deal. The safe zone will provide the Syrian land the Saudis need for their new pipeline

Sonday President Donald Trump committed to enforcing the Iran nuclear deal, despite his campaign pledge to dismantle it.  In a phone call with Saudi Arabia King Salman, the President pledged to rigorously enforce the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.

Along with Israel, Saudi Arabia has been one of the Middle Eastern countries most opposed to the Iran nuclear deal.  During the call, Trump and King Salman committed to address Iran’s destabilizing regional activities.
Saudi Arabia was not among the 7 nations temporarily banned from USA.
http://www.timesofisrael.com/in-c...s-to-rigorously-enforce-iran-deal


Saudi king agrees to support Syria, Yemen safe zones.
Egyptian President El-Sisi has been helping Assad in Syria and assisting Saudi King in Yemen.  King Salman of Saudi Arabia advisers is Egyptian President Fattah Abdel el-Sisi, who has already established a relationship with President Trump. No doubt King Salman and President Sisi debriefed the prior conversations between Trump and el-Sisi.

Jordan King Abdullah is already on team Sisi.

Syria President Assad belongs to Alawaite Shia Islam. Iran is Shia. Saudi Arabia, majority of Iraq and many others are Sunni. There relations are like those of Catholics and Protestants 400 to 500 years ago. Also Iran is near Putins borders.

The Art of the Deal gone global!
President Donald Trump speaks and the world acts.
TRUMPKRIEG!
http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/3518998/posts

.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
CJ
Site Admin


Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32219



PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 7:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

2 killed in attack on Saudi warship off Yemen
Jan 30, 2017  
-  Houthis blow up a Royal Saudi Navy ship off Yemen.
The U.S. Navy is prepared to aid Saudi ship.

Houthi attacked a Saudi warship with 3 boats off the western coast of Yemen, causing an explosion that killed two crew members and injured 3 others.  One of the boats collided with the rear of the vessel, causing an explosion and a fire .

Iran claimed the attack was carried out by Houthi with a guided missile, other reports say it was a suicide boat.
http://twitter.com/Conflicts/status/826142770062643200
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkjWWiUKQII&feature=youtu.be
http://www.yahoo.com/news/two-kil...-warship-off-yemen-210013739.html
http://www.yahoo.com/news/iranian...hi-militants-yemen-193358876.html
http://www.stripes.com/news/middl...truck-off-coast-of-yemen-1.451689
http://defense-watch.com/2017/01/...anti-ship-missile-off-coast-yemen

.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
CJ
Site Admin


Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32219



PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2017 9:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ballistic missile strikes Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
A surface-to-surface missile fired by the Yemeni Army has hit Riyadh.
http://www.almasdarnews.com/artic...ssile-strikes-riyadh-saudi-arabia

Ballistic missile strikes Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Feb 6, 2017  
-  Saudi Arabia intervened military in the Yemeni Conflict in 2015, leading a coalition of almost 10 Middle Eastern countries. In October 2016, a Yemeni activist warned that Riyadh was the next target for a Yemeni missile attack. The rocket didnt reach Riyahd.
http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-chat/3521779/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3521678/posts

Saudi Arabia shoots down Yemen missile
October 12, 2016  
-  Saudi Arabia shot down a ballistic missile fired into the kingdom from Yemen.  The missile was destroyed without causing any injuries. One missile apparently targeted a Saudi air base near Mecca.
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016...down-yemen-ballistic-missile.html


WW3 heating up - Missile fired at USS warship from Yemen last Oct.
Iran is using Yemen to attack Saudi.  Any missiles from Yemen originated in Iran.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
CJ
Site Admin


Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32219



PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 6:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Riyadh base hit
Feb 7, 2017  DEBKA
-  Yemeni Houthi rebel rocket fire reportedly hit a military camp west of Al-Mazahimiyah, west of Riyadh, with a Borkan Scud-type missile.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
CJ
Site Admin


Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32219



PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 8:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Arabia deports 40,000 Pakistanis
Feb 9, 2017  
-  Almost 40,000 Pakistanis deported by S. Arabia amid concerns over terror  between October 2016 and January 2017. The official reason was violation of visa rules, with a high rate of involvement in serious crimes including drug dealing and violence. However, the actual reason was concern they could set up Islamic State terror networks in Arabia.  Afghan Taliban members could infiltrate into Saudi Arabia disguised as migrants from Pakistan, which borders Afghanistan.
http://debka.com/newsupdatepopup/...-Arabia-amid-concerns-over-terror

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    cj.myfreeforum.org Forum Index -> ISRAEL and MidEast NEWS All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 24, 25, 26  Next
Page 25 of 26

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum