cj.myfreeforum.org Forum Index cj.myfreeforum.org
NEWS, prophecy, dreams, ZionsCRY, Bible, teaching, visions
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Page 1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic    cj.myfreeforum.org Forum Index -> HEALTH and Medical NEWS
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Site Admin

Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32234

PostPosted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 11:22 am    Post subject: VACCINES Are DANGEROUS, Ebola, Autism, HPV  Reply with quote

      Epidemics, Plagues, Mandatory Vaccines, Dubai and Copenhagen


I know this is like looking into the future.  I know its speculation, but there is basis.
A friend of mine woke today with an ominus feeling of dread.  Very unlike him.
He stopped by and as we visited he had pieces of a vision.  He 'saw' people in an uproar.
We prayed for Jesus to give us revelation of what HE was trying to tell us.  
After discussing a lot of what, why, pieces in news, and a couple Alex Jones stories, this was the outcome.
YOU be the judges of what I have here.  Feedback welcome.  I KNOW this is incomplete!

The tentacles of the NWO are global, hanging in every corner of the earth.
Only GOD's angels can cut them off.

There will be great earthquakes, famines and pestilences in various places.  Luke 21:11

This is a perfect setup, A PERFECTLY EVIL PLAN!
ALL of this is a perfect setup to demand a mandatory vaccine.
Cause a crisis, then offer the solution.  Except the solution is Death.
Been years planning in detail.

Ukraine Deaths result of IMF Loans
This is absolutely chilling

Another lung plague - TB.  This is a de-population KEY.
IMF countries had significantly more TB cases, and more deaths from TB than countries without IMF loans.
IMF loans demand less government spending, fewer doctors, just dont treat the sick.
Basic health care issue, and provision of services and restrictons to get the IMF loans, so when you get the loan, you get to commit partial genocide.
HOW is that done?  - It all comes back to a mandatory vaccine

They found these IMF countries had significantly more TB cases, and more deaths from TB than countries without IMF loans.


ROUND 2 BEGAN in CHICAGO[/size] - November 27, 2009

Chicago offers LIVE vaccine at airports
November 27, 2009  This is insane!  It will spread this plague to everyone on the plane - and all their destinations! Travelers at Chicago airports will have the option of getting a flu virus up their nose.
I BELIEVE THIS IS ROUND 2 OF THE NWO PLAN TO DE-POPULATE EARTH.  There is just no rationale for this.

That could be an epicenter for the spread of XTB.
WHAT a VICIOUS PLAN!  People will be told they have swine flu, when its XTB they have, probably SUPER TB which contains the airbourne AIDS virus too. One single diagnosis cannot cure the patient.

A live virus vaccine nasal mist was given at the Chicago Illinois airports.
Might that have had the live XTB virus in it?
Bugs spread so easy in airplanes, even if you did not get the shot, you are ON THE PLANE and breathe the re-circulated air.
Everyone who had the vaccine is contagious.


.. I mean .. Debt
In the midst of the bugs conversation, he mentions Dubai.
I said - what?  How does Dubai fit into this bug chat?

Dubai is just a harbinger of things to come for sovereign debt.  According to Moodys, the total stock of sovereign debt worldwide will have risen by half between 2007 and 2010 to $15.3 trillion.  
Watch out. This may be just the beginning. In the scale of things, the debt problems of Dubai are little more than a flea bite.
Dubai sovereign debts total just $80bn, which counts for nothing against the trillions being raised by advanced economies to plug fiscal deficits.

That is where the NWO plans to eliminate the sovereignty of the USA and all countries, and establish a single monetary currency for all nations.
Bible believers expect the 666 beast system of Revelation will eventually be the implanted RFID chip - tracking chip, death chip.  And that is in the USA Sinate healthcare bill now.


In July 2007  I was tracking a super form of TB in the USA and Africa.  As we talked, he referenced that.
Now I have to update that page!

ROUND 3 - South Africa World Cup January, 2010?

Super TB - XDR TB - will spread from world cup games in South Africa in January, 2010
Antibiotic resistant TB - XDR TB - has been in South Africa.  There has been talk it is airbourne and can carry the AIDS virus.

People from all nations go to the games.  Will S.A. mandate everyone must get a shot before entering stadium?
It all comes back to a mandatory vaccine

ALL of this is a perfect setup to demand a mandatory vaccine.
Cause a crisis, then offer the solution.  Except the solution is Death.
Been years planning in detail.

Black lung plague across Europe, mystery pneumonia

Ukraine disease after aerial spraying, November 2009


Correlation between Chemtrails and epidemics?

Gotta see this - you wont believe your eyes


HPV vaccines, Gardasil kills

DANGER!  GSK GlaxoSmithKline

ISIS-DC is killing doctors - July 2015


         Posted   <*))))><   by  

NEWS and analysis you can TRUST


Last edited by CJ on Fri Apr 21, 2017 9:01 am; edited 15 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Site Admin

Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32234

PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


October,  2009   (moved here from another thread)

Experimental vaccine which contain ingredients found in spermicides, cleaners, and cosmetics along with thimerosal and squalene

The package insert from the FDA WEBSITE



H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine Insert Admits It Causes Guillain-Barre (French polio)

The package insert for the Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine manufactured by Novartis has been leaked on the Internet. According to that package insert, the vaccine (based on an earlier vaccine product known as Fluvirin) is known to cause a whole host of very nasty side effects such as guillain-barre syndrome, vasculitis, anaphylactic shock and even death.

The package insert for the Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine lists possible reactions.

Ask your pharmacist for the package insert.

H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine Insert Admits It Causes Guillain-Barre Syndrome, Vasculitis, Paralysis, Anaphylactic Shock And Death

The following is a list of some of the very nasty side effects that the vaccine package insert admits to

*Local injection site reactions (including pain, pain limiting limb movement, redness, swelling, warmth, ecchymosis, induration)

*Hot flashes/flushes
*Facial edema.
*Immune system disorders
*Hypersensitivity reactions (including throat and/or mouth edema)
*In rare cases, hypersensitivity reactions have lead to anaphylactic shock and death
*Cardiovascular disorders
*Vasculitis (in rare cases with transient renal involvement)
*Syncope shortly after vaccination
*Digestive disorders
*Abdominal pain.
*Blood and lymphatic disorders
*Local lymphadenopathy
*Transient thrombocytopenia.
*Metabolic and nutritional disorders
*Loss of appetite.
*Nervous system disorders
*Febrile convulsions
*Guillain-Barré Syndrome
*Myelitis (including encephalomyelitis and transverse myelitis)
*Neuropathy (including neuritis)
*Paralysis (including Bell’s Palsy)
*Respiratory disorders
*Chest pain
*Stevens-Johnson syndrome
*Rash (including non-specific, maculopapular, and vesiculobulbous).

H1N1 info

Dr. Russell Blaylock is an expert on vaccines and their side effects, and he has distributed a list of things that you can do to reduce the nasty side effects of the swine flu vaccine

H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine Insert Admits It Causes Guillain-Barre Syndrome, Vasculitis, Paralysis, Anaphylactic Shock And Death

Bird flu info

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Site Admin

Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32234

PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Contaminated Rotarix Vaccine Approved for Children
May 14, 2010
 OUR EVIL GOVERNMENT - totally controlled by satan
The Rotarix vaccine made by GlaxoSmithKline is again recommended for use in children,
2 months after some samples were contaminated with a virus found in meat products.
The Food and Drug Administration said Friday that it had no evidence that the virus posed safety concerns and that the vaccine’s benefits outweighed any potential risk.
The agency urged suspending Rotarix use on March 22 after an academic research team found pieces of porcine circovirus virus type 1, or PCV-1, in materials used to make more than 69 million doses globally.

BornAgain2 wrote:
Rotarix Vaccine Approved for Children
May 14, 2010
The Rotarix vaccine made by GlaxoSmithKline is again recommended for use in children, two months after some samples were contaminated with a virus found in meat products


The INGREDIENTS in the vaccines, how they are cultured today, ARE NOT the SAME as they were many years ago.

Last edited by CJ on Fri Nov 25, 2016 10:34 am; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Site Admin

Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32234

PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 7:00 am    Post subject: AUTISM * VACCINE * AMISH Reply with quote

April 21, 2010   LifeNews.com
They are trying to convince everyone there in no link between your child's vaccines and autism.

Study Confirms Link Between Autism and Use of Cells From Abortions in Vaccines
A new study conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency shows a correlation between the
use of cells from babies in abortions in vaccines to an increase in autism rates.
The study provides another problem from pro-life advocates who are already concerned about the abortion-vaccine tie.
The study, published in February in the publication Environmental Science & Technology, confirms 1988 as a “change point” in the rise of Autism Disorder rate.

"Although the debate about the nature of increasing autism continues, the potential for this increase to be real and involve exogenous environmental stressors exists," the study says.
The 1988 date is significant because, as pro-life blogger Jill Stanek notes, the Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute indicates that's when the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices added a second dose of the MMR vaccine, containing fetal cells from aborted babies, to its recommendations.

The study found two other change point dates: 1981, two years after MMRII was approved in the United States with fetal cells, and 1995, when SCPI says the chickenpox vaccine using aborted cells was approved.

Jim Sedlak, vice president of American Life League, said today that his group is joining SCPI in calling for a Fair Labeling and Informed Consent Act to let people know of this link and the use of cells from babies victimized by abortion.

“For years the evidence has pointed toward the link between vaccines using DNA from aborted babies and the rise of Autism Disorder rates,” he said. “Parents need and deserve to know the risks associated with vaccinations made from lines derived from the bodies of aborted children.”

"While the pharmaceutical industry ignores the evidence and continues to put our children at risk," Sound Choice is conducting studies on the impact of residual human fetal DNA in vaccines on the brain development and autism in children, Sedlak continued.

Stanek also commented on the new developments.
"I've always read it was mercury in vaccines that was implicated in autism, although many studies state this isn't true," she said, noted SCPI debunks the idea.

"The conspiracy theorist in me wonders if the same sort of ideological culprits we see covering up the abortion-breast cancer link are also involved here. This would be a huge, huge blow to embryonic stem cell experimentation, for instance. That, and/or big pharma sees huge class action lawsuits on the horizon if this is proven," Stanek added.

"That virus-laden DNA of aborted babies could be wreaking havoc on the DNA of healthy children is completely plausible," she said.
SCPI will present their studies at the International Society for Autism Research in May 2010.
Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute
[url]http://www.soundchoice.org and http://www.soundchoice.org/Images/SCPINewsletter_April_2010.pdf [/url]

Environmental Protection Agency: Timing of Increased Autistic Disorder Cumulative Incidence (10 July 2009)

Here are other threads I have on vaccines

CONNECTING the DOTS, Plague, vaccines, whats coming?

Dont get vaccine


Last edited by CJ on Sun Sep 21, 2014 12:14 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Site Admin

Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32234

PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 7:00 am    Post subject: Testimonies Reply with quote

BornAgain2 wrote:
There's autism in my family b/c of THIS.
For a long time, we thought the child was BORN with autism...it as as if we were LIED to, and even worse, today's 501c3 Apostate church says NOTHING on this issue.
I wonder what these PDL churches have to say about this - after all, Rick Warren is a CFR member, and the CFR engineered the H1N1 vaccine shots in recent years.

AgainstTheFlow wrote:
My grandson has autism.
I have studied it and know that the vaccines do have a predominate roll in this illness.
Also I learned from my study that America leads the way in children with Autism.
It is almost non existent in 3rd world countries where there are no vaccines.

Thank you both for posting.  How I wish more parents believed this.
The Amish children do not have autism, - and they DO NOT get vaccines.

BornAgain2 wrote:
CJ wrote:
How I wish more parents believed this.
The Amish children do not have autism, - and they DO NOT get vaccines.

And let's not forget too the Council on Foreign Relations was the one BEHIND engineering these vaccine shots last year(which failed, BTW).
I really, really hate to say this, but not only him, but all those churches that are yoked up with the Purpose Driven Network have blood on their hands too.

Vaccines made with fetal cells cause autism.

EPA researchers publishing a study in the Feb. 16 issue of Environmental Science & Technology were "surprise[ed]" to find a worldwide jump in the incidence of autism beginning in 1988.

Thus, the study concluded, "Although the debate about the nature of increasing autism continues, the potential for this increase to be real and involve exogenous environmental stressors exists."

According to the Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, 1988 was the year the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices
added a second dose of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine to its list of recommendations.

SCPI actually found three "change points" in autism trends – 1981, 1988 and 1995. Here is what correlated to those years:

All 3 of those vaccines contained and contain aborted human fetal cells.

I'd always read it was mercury in vaccines that was implicated in autism. But according to SCPI:

   Interestingly, the vaccines that can be associated with the autism trend change points never contained mercury, and some animal produced vaccines used universally in the U.S. before 1979 contained levels of mercury as high, if not higher, than current levels.

The EPA study relied on previous studies to deny a link between autism and vaccines. But there is a new wrinkle. NaturalNews.com  reported April 12:

   One of the central figures in the Center for Disease Control's claims about vaccine safety is reported to be under investigation by Danish police after almost $2 million turned up missing that was supposed to have been spent on research.

   Dr. Poul Thorsen, one of the researchers involved in two highly publicized autism reports published in the influential New England Journal of Medicine, was accused of fraud last month. …

   Thorsen's Danish studies from 2002 and 2003 are widely referred to by groups that dispute the vaccine connection to autism and nervous system disorders. …

   Thorsen … is a psychiatrist and not a research scientist or toxicologist. ... In all, CDC is reported to have paid Thorsen's center $14.6 million since 2002. …

   In addition, Thorsen's partner Kreesten Madsen recently came under fire after damning e-mails surfaced showing Madsen working with CDC officials intent on fraudulently cherry picking facts to prove vaccine safety.

While the CDC and co-authors of those studies insist on their veracity, liberals, who believe there is a link between autism and mercury in vaccines, called for an investigation:

"Questions about Thorsen's scientific integrity may finally force CDC to rethink the vaccine protocols since most of the other key pro-vaccine studies cited by CDC rely on the findings of Thorsen's research group," Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wrote on the Huffington Post. "The validity of all these studies is now in question."

It would be ironic if the liberal demand for additional research helped lead to a confirmed link between autism and vaccines containing aborted fetal cells.

Meanwhile, in light of the EPA's findings, SCPI is calling for a Fair Labeling and Informed Consent Act so parents can make an educated decision whether to allow their children to receive vaccinations containing aborted human fetal cells.

SCPI is also calling for more studies. SCPI President Theresa Deisher told me by phone, "The research thus far is too compelling and too closely associated across decades and across continents. The rise in autism is real. People can no longer brush it off. And vaccines containing fetal cells are a very plausible environmental trigger that must be investigated."

A pro-abort bloggers lambasted a blog post I wrote on the questionable link between autism and vaccines containing fetal cells. Amanda Marcotte at Pandagon wrote:

   [A]nti-choicers are running with a bull---t story that vaccines are made with aborted fetuses, and that's what causes autism. This article and the one it banks off of from Jill Stanek are both amazing examples of what can be produced when a person has no respect for their audience's intelligence or the truth.

Marcotte began by disputing that the aforementioned vaccines are made from aborted fetal cells:

   The claim that vaccines are made from aborted fetuses is farcical on its face. But it shouldn't be surprising. I think your rank and file anti-choicers probably believe that stem cells are cultivated from aborted fetuses (they're actually take from embryos created for IVF that were going to be thrown away if not used in research), and that they're already being used in standard medical care like vaccines (they're not). …

   The assertion that vaccines are made from aborted fetuses is such a weird idea that I don't imagine the EPA even examined that assertion in the first place.

So let's clear up that they are.

All vaccines in question – rubella, MMR and chicken pox – among others, are derived from either the MRC-5 or WI-38 cell lines.

According to the National Network for Immunization Information, among numerous sources (Google "WI-38 aborted" or "MRC-5 aborted" for more validations, such as this Salon article, or footnote 1 on this Merck label or even Wikipedia), "WI-38 came from lung cells from a female fetus of three-months gestation and MRC-5 was developed from lung cells from a 14-week-old male fetus. Both fetuses were intentionally aborted."

Marcotte was right that the EPA hasn't investigated the potential connection. Dr. Deisher told me Thorsen and his research team "never accounted for the co-variants containing residual produced using human fetal cells. This wasn't even on their radar."

Dr. Deisher has had a different experience when discussing this issue with abortion proponents. "One can be pro-abortion and want safe vaccines for their children and all children. One can be pro-abortion and object to the cannibalization of aborted children. Philosophically, they are sickened by the thought of injecting their child with the DNA of an aborted fetus."

Marcotte, childless, is in no position to argue in favor of recommending another's child as a human science experiment.

Nor, I noted, did Marcotte suggest another reason for the spike in autism beginning in 1988.

But concerned parents can find alternatives to aborted fetal vaccines at this Michigan Right to Life link.

CHARTS on link

BornAgain2 wrote:
Yep - that's why the Amish community has been under intense persecution by the NWO. The calamity where that milkman walked into their school and went into a rampage - that was a false flag(he was under Mind Control) from what I understand.

May the Lord richly bless the Amish community - they held strong to their faith, and FORGAVE that man by helping out his family financially, and witnessed the gospel of Jesus Christ to them! In the end, Satan LOST!


Last edited by CJ on Wed Jan 28, 2015 11:49 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Site Admin

Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32234

PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 7:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Doctor Andrew Wakefield links autism to vaccine
He is fighting the NWO plot to kill earth's population using toxic vaccines
The NWO (Revelation 13 beast system) TOTALLY CONTROL ALL TV
Was it a toxic vaccine experiment in Ukraine in 2009?

British doctor who linked vaccine to autism struck off Regis
24 May 2010
LONDON  – A British doctor who linked the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine with autism was struck off the medical register Monday after being found guilty of serious professional misconduct.

The General Medical Council (GMC) found Andrew Wakefield, 53, had acted in a way that was "dishonest", "misleading" and "irresponsible" while conducting research on a possible link between the vaccine, bowel disease and autism.

Wakefield's 1998 study in The Lancet medical journal in which he linked MMR and autism sparked huge controversy, and despite experts and governments insisting the jab was safe, caused a huge slump in the vaccination rate.

The Lancet retracted the article earlier this year after the GMC ruled Wakefield had acted "dishonestly" while carrying out his research.

The doctor, who was an honorary consultant in experimental gastroenterology at London's Royal Free Hospital at the time of his research, said he had had consent for using the children involved in his study and would appeal.

"I will be appealing," he told Sky News television.

In a separate statement, he said the case against him and his retired 73-year-old colleague, Professor John Walker-Smith, who was also struck off Monday, was an attempt to silence him.

"In reporting their findings the GMC panel sought to deny that the case against me and my colleagues is related to issues of MMR vaccine safety and specifically, the role of this vaccine in causing autism," he said.

"This is not in fact the case. Efforts to discredit and silence me through the GMC process have provided a screen to shield the government from exposure on the (Pluserix) MMR vaccine scandal."

Another colleague, Professor Simon Murch, was found not guilty.

The GMC panel heard how Wakefield had ordered some children in his care to undergo unnecessary colonoscopies, lumbar punctures (spinal taps), barium meals, blood and urine tests and brain scans as part of his research.

The doctor also took blood from his son's friends at a birthday party, paying the youngsters five pounds (seven dollars, six euros) each.

"The panel concluded that Dr. Wakefield's conduct not only collectively amounts to serious professional misconduct over a timeframe from 1996 to 1999 but also, considered individually, constitutes multiple separate instances of serious professional misconduct," panel chairman Dr. Surendra Kumar said.

Professor Terence Stephenson, president of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, said the suggestion of a link between autism and MMR had done "untold damage" to Britain's vaccination programme.
"We cannot stress too strongly that all children and young people should have the MMR vaccine. Overwhelming scientific evidence shows that it is safe," he said.

Last edited by CJ on Sun Sep 21, 2014 12:15 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Site Admin

Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32234

PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 7:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TRUEMAN wrote:
Why Medical Authorities Went to Such Extremes to Silence Dr. Andrew Wakefield

Interview with Dr. Andrew Wakefield
THANKS Dr. TRUMAN!  I listened to Wakefield in an interview with Alex Jones May 25, 2010     Alex Jones
Alex talks with Dr. Andrew Wakefield, the British former surgeon and researcher who was banned by the General Medical Council from practicing medicine in UK for
his research and public statements linking the Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine to childhood autism.

In November 2001 Wakefield became a fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists in recognition of his research publications.
Dr. Wakefield is the author of Callous Disregard: Autism and Vaccines — The Truth Behind a Tragedy, available at the Infowars Store.
Watch the video archive and access the high quality MP3

Dr. Andrew Wakefield, the hero whose controversial paper ignited a media firestorm about autism, GI disease and the MMR vaccine

Last edited by CJ on Wed Jan 28, 2015 11:46 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Site Admin

Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32234

PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 7:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Turning disgrace into publicity
May 26, 2010  
  The decisions from the General Medical Council on what actions will be taken on Doctors Andrew Wakefield, John Walker-Smith and Dr. Simon Murch for improper actions already found proven in previous hearings.
In advance material for his book, even Dr. Wakefield has been stating that he will be struck off the register:
“In the pursuit of possible links between childhood vaccines, intestinal inflammation, and neurologic injury in children,
Wakefield lost his job in London’s Royal Free Hospital, his country of birth, his career, and his medical license.”
This is one place where I would agree with Dr. Wakefield. The idea that he’s about to lose his license seems a safe enough bet to just admit it as already having happened.

Dr. Wakefield has decided to quite literally defend him self in the court of public opinion, rather than the hearing room.
As Mike Stanton points out in Andrew Wakefield’s Farewell, Dr. Wakefield did not call any of the families involved in the his research in his defense.
Instead he relies on the rallying cry, “no family has ever complained…”

Brian Deer, in his recent article Weeping wounds of the MMR scare addresses this rallying cry:
 Even some of those involved in his research now tell me they have had enough of his antics.
“Please let me know if Andrew W has his doctor’s licence revoked,” emailed the father of Child 11.
“His misrepresentation of my son in his research paper is inexcusable. His motives for this, I may never know.”

Dr. Wakefield will not appear before the GMC to hear the verdict.
He was in New York on TV, where Matt Lauer interviewed him.
This may be the high water mark in Dr. Wakefield’s publicity campaign, which has included direct-to-youtube interviews with Dr. Mercola (
whose runs probably the most trafficked medical misinformation website, if I may state my opinion),
another made-for-internet interview, and a future interview on internet radio (10pm to midnight).
This in addition to his keynote talk at an anti-vaccine rally to be held this week.

He may also be up for the first knighthood ever given out by AutismOne, at least in the wishful thoughts of his supporters.
In other words, he is moving from side show of the autism research community to center ring in his own circus.

Last edited by CJ on Wed May 15, 2013 10:51 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Site Admin

Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32234

PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 7:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Antivaccine hero Andrew Wakefield[/color]: Scientific fraud?
February  2009
 Pity poor Andrew Wakefield.
Actually, on second thought, Wakefield deserves no pity at all. After all, he is the man who almost single-handedly launched the scare over the MMR vaccine in Britain when he published his infamous Lancet paper in 1998 in which he claimed to have linked the MMR vaccine to regressive autism and inflammation of the colon, a study that was followed up four years later with a paper that claimed to have found the strain of attenuated measles virus in the MMR in the colons of autistic children by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). It would be one thing if these studies were sound science. If that were the case, then Wakefield’s work would have been very important and would have correctly cast doubt on the safety of the MMR. Unfortunately, they were not, and, indeed, most of the authors of the 1998 Lancet paper later withdrew their names from it.

Over the next decade, aided and abetted by useful idiots in the media, by British newspapers and other media that sensationalized the story, and the antivaccine movement, which hailed Wakefield as a hero, Wakefield managed to drive MMR vaccination rates in the U.K. below the level of herd immunity, from 93% to 75% (and as low as 50% in some parts of London). As a result Wakefield has been frequently sarcastically “thanked” for his leadership role in bringing the measles back to the U.K. to the point where, fourteen years after measles had been declared under control in the U.K., it was in 2008 declared endemic again.

Worse, this fear was based on the worst science imaginable. First, no scientist not associated with Andrew Wakefield has ever been able to replicate his work. Second, as was exposed by U.K. reporter Brian Deer, not only was Wakefield paid big bucks by trial lawyers seeking to sue vaccine manufacturers for “vaccine injury” to do his studies on autistic children, a conflict of interest he never revealed and that had to be exposed through Deer’s investigations, but months before he published his Lancet paper Wakefield had applied for a patent on a an allegedly safer single measles vaccine that could succeed best if the safety of the MMR were called into doubt. Even after all of this came to light, leading to Wakefield’s correctly being dragged in front of the General Medical Council for charges of scientific misconduct. Even after this, he still enjoys a cult of personality that I can’t figure out, and is often portrayed as being “persecuted” by the British medical establishment.

Third, was revealed at the Autism Omnibus proceedings when PCR expert Stephen Bustin testified about the shoddy methods at the laboratory used to do the PCR on the colon biopsies. In brief, the laboratory used was set up such that cross contamination between the plasmids used to maintain the measles virus sequences and the area where the PCR was done. PCR is very sensitive; if there is contaminating plasmid sequence, it is very easy to amplify and detect it even when there is nothing in your samples. Indeed, I’ve experienced this very problem on occasion in my own lab. Unfortunately, in the case of Wakefield’s research, no controls were done to make sure that contamination was detected in the negative controls. Finally, Wakefield’s results were roundly refuted in an attempt to replicate his work that was published last year. As you can see, Wakefield’s work and ethics are about as bad as it gets.

Or so I thought, until readers started sending me this article published in The Times, again by Wakefield’s nemesis Brian Deer. Holy crap. If only a fraction of the allegations in this article are true, not only is Wakefield an unscrupulous and incompetent scientist but he’s a scientific fraud as well:

   The doctor who sparked the scare over the safety of the MMR vaccine for children changed and misreported results in his research, creating the appearance of a possible link with autism, a Sunday Times investigation has found.

   Confidential medical documents and interviews with witnesses have established that Andrew Wakefield manipulated patients’ data, which triggered fears that the MMR triple vaccine to protect against measles, mumps and rubella was linked to the condition.

   The research was published in February 1998 in an article in The Lancet medical journal. It claimed that the families of eight out of 12 children attending a routine clinic at the hospital had blamed MMR for their autism, and said that problems came on within days of the jab. The team also claimed to have discovered a new inflammatory bowel disease underlying the children’s conditions.

   However, our investigation, confirmed by evidence presented to the General Medical Council (GMC), reveals that: In most of the 12 cases, the children’s ailments as described in The Lancet were different from their hospital and GP records. Although the research paper claimed that problems came on within days of the jab, in only one case did medical records suggest this was true, and in many of the cases medical concerns had been raised before the children were vaccinated. Hospital pathologists, looking for inflammatory bowel disease, reported in the majority of cases that the gut was normal. This was then reviewed and the Lancet paper showed them as abnormal.

The complete story reveals behavior on the part of Wakefield that leaves me just shaking my head in disbelief. It’s simply unbelievable.

Let’s step back a minute. The original Lancet paper examined the cases of twelve children with autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. In the paper, it was reported that in 8 of the 12 children with regressive autism the onset of developmental changes closely followed MMR vaccination and in one of the 12 it followed measles infection. Moreover, colonoscopy showed colon abnormalities “ranging from lymphoid nodular hyperplasia to aphthoid ulceration.” In 11 children, biopsy histology showed patchy chronic inflammation in the colon. The conclusion was that there was an apparent association between MMR vaccination and a syndrome of regressive autism and inflammatory bowel changes. Even though the paper’s tone was more tentative than one would have thought given the furor it launched and even though it stated that the authors “did not prove an association between measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine and the syndrome described,” Wakefield promoted his results to the media as though he had definitely found a link between the MMR vaccine and a syndrome consisting of regressive autism and inflammatory bowel disease. Thus was launched the scare that caused a thousand cases of measles (in 2008) that could have been avoided and caused many autistic children to be subjected to invasive procedures they didn’t need, sometimes at the cost of serious complications.

If the latest information is true, however, Wakefield is guilty of more than shoddy science and unreported conflicts of interest. He is guilty of scientific fraud and falsifying the medical reports of these children. For example, take Child 11, whose father requested a second set of testing on his child’s biopsy specimens:

   MR ELEVEN’S taxi dash was a small ride in his desperate quest to find an answer for his son’s condition. Today, Child Eleven is much improved: at 17, he is a terrific scholar, although too nervous to drive.

   The extra tests on his biopsies produced striking results. His father asked the cancer institute to look for the measles virus, which lay at the heart of Wakefield’s concerns over the vaccine. According to a theory that underpinned the project, this virus in MMR was the cause of bowel disease, which then did damage to children’s brains.

   “It took a big fight to get the information,” said Mr Eleven. “They told me there was no measles virus. I had the tests repeated three times at different labs in the US, and they all came back negative.”
   This struck a different note from what Wakefield suggested when describing his research to the world.
   “We would not have presented this paper to The Lancet had we not undertaken extensive virological studies already,” he told the 1998 press conference.

Of course, this anomaly could simply have been due to the aforementioned incompetence of the lab that Wakefield used to test his specimens for MMR strain measles virus, with its procedures guaranteed to produce false positives. Unfortunately, there’s more. A lot more.

Take Child One:
   In the paper this claim would be adopted, with Wakefield and his team reporting that Child One’s parents said “behavioural symptoms” started “one week” after he received the MMR.
   The boy’s medical records reveal a subtly different story, one familiar to mothers and fathers of autistic children. At the age of 9½ months, 10 weeks before his jab, his mother had become worried that he did not hear properly: the classic first symptom presented by sufferers of autism.

This is an incredibly common story among parents who believe that vaccines caused their child’s autism. Many vaccines are scheduled to be given during the same time that children often show the first behavioral alterations associated with autism, and it is not uncommon either for such changes to occur within a few weeks of a vaccination by random chance alone, nor is it uncommon for parents to remember incorrectly that the child’s symptoms started soon after a vaccine when they did not. Indeed, it is not uncommon at all for experts to be able to detect the subtler signs of autism on videotapes of babies before the parents noticed and before the child received the vaccinations for which parents blame the condition. Unfortunately, human memory is fallable, and it easily relates events that are not closely related, particularly in response to other information or preexisting beliefs. This happens all the time with vaccines and autism, where numerous epidemiological studies have failed to find an association between either mercury in thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism, between MMR and autism, and between vaccines in general and autism.

And Child Two:
   This was Child Two, an eight-year-old boy from Peter-borough, Cambridgeshire, diagnosed with regressive autism, which, according to the Lancet paper, started “two weeks” after his jab.
   However, this child’s medical records, backed by numerous specialist assessments, said his problems began three to five months later.

And the list goes on:
   Only one was a girl, Child Eight, aged 3, from Whitley Bay, Tyne & Wear. She was reported in the journal as having suffered a brain injury “two weeks” after MMR.
   Her medical records did not support this. Before she was admitted, she had been seen by local specialists, and her GP told the Royal Free of “significant concerns about her development some months before she had her MMR”.

   Child Six, aged 5, and Child Seven, aged 3, were said to have been diagnosed with regressive autism, with an onset of symptoms “one week” and “24 hours” after the jab respectively.
   But medical records show that neither boy was “previously normal”, as the Lancet article described all the children, and that both had already been hospitalised with brain problems before their MMR.

   Child Six received his vaccine at the age of 14 months, but had twice previously been admitted with fits.
   Child Seven was given his at the age of 20 months but, again, problems already showed.

In other words, one of two things happened, neither of which is flattering to Wakefield. Either he took the history from parents, for whom confirmation bias could easily have led to remembering incorrectly that their child’s behavioral changes were noted shortly after the MMR rather than before it or months later, in which case Wakefield was incompetent for not having examined the medical records. Alternatively, Wakefield did examine the medical records and lied about them in the Lancet paper. Take your pick.

In fact, I might have been willing to give Wakefield somewhat of the benefit of the doubt, viewing the discrepancies between the medical records and what he reported in the Lancet paper as being yet more evidence of his shoddiness and incompetence rather than malice, were it not for the major discrepancies between what Wakefield said about the histology of the biopsy specimens in the paper. The Lancet paper described a uniform pattern of patchy inflammation, but apparently what Wakefield reported does not jibe with what the pathologists saw:

   “The uniformity of the intestinal pathological changes and the fact that previous studies have found intestinal dysfunc-tion in children with autistic-spectrum disorders, suggests that the connection is real and reflects a unique disease process, ” the Lancet Paper explained of the “syndrome”.

   Yet pathology records of samples taken from the children show apparent problems with this evidence. The hospital’s consultants who took biopsies from the children’s colons concluded that they were not uniform but varied and unexceptional.

   For Child Eight, the pathology report said: “No abnormality detected”, while the Lancet paper said: “Nonspecific colitis”. This pattern was repeated for two of the other children, Nine and Ten.

   The most striking change of opinion came in the case of Child Three, a six-year-old from Huyton, Merseyside. He was reported in the journal to be suffering from regressive autism and bowel disease: specifically “acute and chronic nonspecific colitis”. The boy’s hospital discharge summary, however, said there was nothing untoward in his biopsy.

Not happy with the readings of the pathologists, apparently Wakefield’s research team met for a “research review” of the biopsy specimens. This in and of itself is not unusual. However, it is unusual that the research team overturned the original readings of so many of the specimens. As Brian Deer put it:

   It was not an unusual move for a group of specialists to reconsider the evidence upon which their research was relying. It was nevertheless striking that their conclusion was that 11 of the children’s bowels were in fact diseased when their colleagues had found no abnormalities in at least seven of the cases.

Quite frankly, such conduct beggars the imagination. It’s about as unethical as it gets. But it’s all of a piece with Andrew Wakefield’s behavior. After all, as I pointed out before, he was in the pocket of a lawyer named Richard Barr seeking to sue vaccine manufacturers for “vaccine-induced” autism before he undertook his research. Not only that, but Barr was affiliated with the antivaccine group Jabs, and Wakefield apparently concocted his new “syndrome” after at least some consultation with Barr. But perhaps the most unethical, at least from a human research standpoint, was that the patients recruited to his study were not anything resembling a random or neutral sample. As pointed out by Brian Deer, the parents of these children heard through word of mouth about Wakefield. Add to that the fact that Wakefield subjected these children to unnecessary invasive medical procedures, and then incompetently analyzed the specimens obtained from them for measles virus to produce a virtually preordained result, even if it took scientific fraud to do it, and you see what I mean. Given such a level of ideological blindness that seems to think his cause so just that good science and ethics are optional in pursuit of it, a lack of concern over blatant conflicts of interest, and an appallingly inflated opinion of himself that he is seems to believe that he is actually a persecuted Galileo, is it any surprise that Wakefield may have stooped so far as to falsify research results in his campaign?

Not to me, it isn’t.

Sadly, none of this will matter to antivaccinationists, who view Wakefield as exactly that–a persecuted scientific hero. Although I have yet to see any response from antivaccine blogs like like Age of Autism, I’m sure that they’ll wax ridiculous about what a great doctor and man Wakefield is and how it’s big pharma and its minions who, frightened by the implications of Wakefield’s work, are working hard to demonize him and suppress his “science.” Unfortunately for their reality-challenged world view, sometimes things are as they appear, sometimes there really is no conspiracy, and sometimes a rat is a rat.

And Wakefield is most definitely a rat. A rat who caused thousands of cases of measles and at least one death.
Read comments

OK - I have reported.  Its up to YOU to decide.
Vaccines today are CAUSING a lot of sickness.  WHY?
Perhaps because today some contain toxins - and fetal tissue from aborted babies.
How are tissues from a baby murdered in great pain going to heal anyone?

August 2010 I combined several threads on vaccines which had been posted on separate threads.
I suggest you PAY ATTENTION.

Last edited by CJ on Wed May 15, 2013 10:53 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    cj.myfreeforum.org Forum Index -> HEALTH and Medical NEWS All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18  Next
Page 1 of 18

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum