cj.myfreeforum.org Forum Index cj.myfreeforum.org
NEWS, prophecy, dreams, ZionsCRY, Bible, teaching, visions
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Judge Andrew Napolitano
Page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    cj.myfreeforum.org Forum Index -> America NEWS
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
CJ
Site Admin


Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32196



PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 2:28 pm    Post subject: Judge Andrew Napolitano  Reply with quote




Judge Andrew Napolitano

When Guns Are Outlawed, Only the Outlaws Will Have Guns
By the time police officers responded to the shooting, the gunmen were gone.
There should not be any gun-free zones anywhere in the USA.
The government can't pick and choose which areas you can't protect yourself.
The November terror attacks in Paris happened despite France having draconian gun restrictions.
http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/1...fter-san-bernardino-mass-shooting

Gun-Free Zones are DANGEROUS!
Gun-free zones are the most dangerous places on the planet!
It's like shooting fish in a barrel!  The last line of defense against these monsters is an armed populace.
http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/1...-are-most-dangerous-places-planet
http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/1...fter-san-bernardino-mass-shooting


FOXNEWS
http://cj.myfreeforum.org/ftopic271-9.php

HARBINGER  WARNINGS - Isaiah 9 prophecy
When GOD destroys USA, you cant say He didnt WARN us!
http://cj.myfreeforum.org/about2307.html


Lies the Government Told You, by Judge Napolitano
LIE, TRUTH, whats the difference?
Truth is identity between intellect and reality.  A lie is a knowing and intentional violation of the truth. I am angry that we allow the government to lie to us, that we expect it to!

We have all come to expect some lying, and the consequences were harmless.
In a free society, we expect the government to wrestle with them as well, but it is not concerned with truth. The government lies to us daily on matters great and small, but it prosecutes and jails those who lie to it.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/20...ew-book-lies-government-told.html


              Posted   <*))))><   by  

ZionsCRY DAILY NEWS with prophetic analysis
http://tinyurl.com/ZcryNEW


 


Last edited by CJ on Sat Apr 01, 2017 2:38 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
CJ
Site Admin


Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32196



PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 2:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trump is media master manipulator  
Dec 10, 2015  Judge Andrew Napolitano
discussed Donald Trump, who gave a 4 line statement and everybody in the media is talking just about this.  And Jeb Bush etc. cant even get a meaningful word in.  So Donald Trump has, yet again, demonstrated himself as the master communicator, the master manipulator of the media.  And the master expander of his base.  He is eclipsing all the other candidates in the media without spending any money.  Jeb is spending millions and The Donald’s not spending, didnt spend a nickel to get all this attention.
http://www.westernjournalism.com/...s-master-manipulator-of-the-media
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
CJ
Site Admin


Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32196



PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 9:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

   


Obama's executive action on guns is unconstitutional
Jan 6, 2016
-  Judge Andrew Napolitano.   Demon resident Obama announced that he is issuing an executive order on guns and background checks.  Illegal under the Constitution of the United States.

A presidential executive order is a written instruction to persons in the executive branch of the federal government informing them of the manner in which the president wants federal laws or regulations enforced. Executive orders do not direct private persons, or persons in the legislative or judicial branches of government. Executive orders remain in effect until abandoned or rescinded by the president who issued them or by a successor president.

Obama has very little room to issue executive orders on guns because the congressional legislation is so extensive, detailed, and clear. The principal thrust of the president's orders addresses the requirement for background checks in occasional sales and the requirement that occasional sellers become federal licensees and the imposition of reporting upon physicians.

Congress has expressly removed occasional sales (sales not made by full-time dealers) from the obligation of obtaining federal licenses and from conducting background checks.

The president is without authority to negate the congressional will on this, and any attempt to do so will be invalidated by the courts.  Obama will now require that anyone who sells a gun, that is even an "occasional" seller will be required to perform a background check. By defining what an "occasional seller" is, the president is essentially interpreting the law, a job reserved for the courts.

Clarence Thomas wrote the SCOTUS opinion invalidating the Clinton background-check mandate on local LE in a case out of Ravalli County, Idaho, in which the sheriff sued for injunctive relief and won.  Obama's EO would appear to be headed for a similar denouement. Go, Clarence!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3380175/posts


Satan speaks against America
Jan 6, 2016  -  Gun Control Executive Action
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/kati...s-executive-action-on-gun-control

Even Media even noticed the demonic rage in 0bama's satanic eyes!


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
CJ
Site Admin


Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32196



PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 12:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Judge challenges HELL-ary
Mar 11, 2016
 -  Judge Andrew Napolitano challenges Hillary Clinton’s public statement - My predecessors did the same thing.  Judge Andrew Napolitano challenged Hillary Clinton’s contention that former secretaries of state also used private email servers to conduct government business.

Judge Napolitano said Hillarys predecessors Secretarys Powell and Rice did nothing of the sort.  They did NOT have servers in their own home.

The secretary of state has 2 email streams: a regular email stream and a secret email stream. Mrs. Clinton hired, at her own expense, an information technologist to divert both email streams to her home server. Secretary Powell and Secretary Rice did nothing of the sort.

Napolitano also challenged Clinton’s statement during the debate that none of the emails sent or received through her private server were marked “classified”.  The FBI knows and she knows that nothing is marked classified.  And yet she continues to mislead the questioners.

Judge Andrew P. Napolitano is the youngest life-tenured Superior Court judge in the history of the State of New Jersey.  
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3407899/posts
http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/barba...on-my-predecessors-did-same-thing
http://www.judgenap.com/bio
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
CJ
Site Admin


Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32196



PostPosted: Fri May 27, 2016 5:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ample Evidence to Indict Hillary
May 27, 2016
 -  After the latest State Department announcement that Hillary Clinton violated government rules, Judge Andrew Napolitano definitively says there is now ample evidence to indict.  Sadly, he is much less certain on whether or not the indictment will actually come.

Napolitano stated
Today is a big deal for a couple of reasons. First, it directly refutes a statement she has made dozens of times, 'it was allowed', we now know that it was NOT allowed. She signed a two page statement under oath on her first day on the job which was given after she had a two hour tutorial by two FBI agents telling her about the proper care and legal obligations for state secrets. In that oath she swore that she had the obligation to know how to care for state secrets and to recognize them."

Here is what's new in the report today. Her server in her house went down a couple of times, and when it went down the blackberry wouldn't work. The state department IT people said 'here use a state department blackberry', and she said through her assistant Huma Abedin 'no because we are concerned with the Freedom of Information Act', so she went dark and she had documents verbally read to her rather than transmitted to her through the state department email system."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3434359/posts
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/201...ce-indict-hillary-judge-thinks-so

Clinton crime family
http://cj.myfreeforum.org/ftopic536-171.php

I have heard Judge Napolitano myself say there is Ample Evidence to Indict Hillary
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
CJ
Site Admin


Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32196



PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 6:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Absence of Morality in US State Dept
June 3, 2016  -  Judge Andrew Napolitano
said the State Department deleting questions from a 2013 briefing is "emblematic of the problem with government.  And the problem with government is if you lie to the government, the government will prosecute you. But the government lies to you and does so with impunity."

People within the department have destroyed their own reputations and are now pointing fingers at each other.  Napolitano said that in order to prove the deletion is illegal, it would have to be determined whether video of a press briefing constitutes a government record, but said that tampering with government records is definitely illegal.

He said it was interesting that former department spokesperson Jen Psaki told Fox News reporter James Rosen that the transcript wasn't tampered with; it was just the video.  That means that there is a thug in the State Department who doesn't even know how to commit his thuggery effectively.
Napolitano said the episode is "symbolic of the absence of morality in government."
http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/0...highlights-govts-absence-morality


FBI asks Putin for his copies of Hillary's Emails
July 3, 2016
 -  Russia giving USA FBI secy of state emails - its hilarious - its terrifying - its infuriating - its indescribable.
FBI still does not have roughly 30,000 emails that Hillary Clinton deleted from her private server.   Russia may be in possession of those emails, and according to Judge Andrew Napolitano, there is a debate going on in the Kremlin about whether or not to release them.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3445953/posts


Last edited by CJ on Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:26 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
CJ
Site Admin


Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32196



PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 10:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

WHAT IF
July 21, 2016  Judge Napolitano
 -  What if the folks who run the Department of Political Justice recently were told that the republic would suffer if Hillary Clinton were indicted for espionage because Donald Trump might succeed Barack Obama in the presidency?  What if espionage is the failure to safeguard state secrets and the evidence that Clinton failed to safeguard them is unambiguous and overwhelming?

What if resident Obama never really liked his former rival whom he appointed as his secretary of state?  What if he had no real interest in seeing her succeed him because he and his wife simply could never trust her?

What if, when HELLary Clinton suggested to Obama that the U.S. wage a secret undeclared war against Libya, Obama went along with it?  What if he assumed that if her secret war succeeded he’d get the credit and if her secret war failed she would get the blame?

What if the means of fighting the secret war consisted of employing intelligence assets rather than the U.S. military?  What if Clinton concocted that idea because the use of the military requires a public reporting to the entire Congress but the use of intelligence assets requires only a secret reporting to a dozen members of Congress?

What if Clinton expanded her war by permitting American and foreign arms dealers to bypass the NATO arms embargo on Libya by selling heavy-duty, military-grade arms directly to militias in Libya?  What if this was Clinton’s dream scenario -- an apparent civil war in Libya in which the victorious side was secretly armed by the U.S., with democracy brought to the country and Clinton the architect of it all?

What if the CIA warned Clinton that this would backfire?  What if the CIA told her that she was arming anti-American terrorist groups?  What if she rejected all that advice?  What if providing material assistance to terrorist groups is a felony?  What if the Department of Political Justice actually obtained an indictment of an American arms dealer for going along with Clinton’s schemes?
long list of what ifs - which ARE
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/20...-at-obama-justice-department.html

All his listed fixes were in.  USA has a corrupt enemy govt.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
CJ
Site Admin


Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32196



PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Exclamation   Judge Nap vs DoJ
Oct 6, 2016
-  WHOA BABY!  ITS JUST YUGE!  
Judge Nap absolutely LAID IT OUT about why DoJ dropt case against Libyan arms dealer.  It woulda nailed Hellary!  It appeared Fox host tried to silence Judge but he kept talking.  God bless him!  DoJ dropt the case on the guy who fingers Hillary for guns to ISIS
http://www.youtube.com/user/FoxNewsChannel
http://www.judgenap.com


HILLARYs WAR
Crooked DOJ dropped charges against arms dealer to protect HELLary Clinton.
The Department of Justice moved to drop charges against arms dealer Marc Turi because his defense would expose Hillary Clinton’s arms running to ISIS-Libya in 2011, Judge Andrew Napolitano revealed.

Justice Department lawyers filed a motion to drop the case against Turi.  Even though the trial would be after Election Day, the Justice Department did not want to be in a position of defending Secretary Clinton.  Lynch knows she's a crook - they all are.
http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/judge-...-case-exposes-hillarys-secret-war


even politico has that story
http://www.politico.com/story/201...yan-rebels-hillary-clinton-229115

FIB, DoJ
http://cj.myfreeforum.org/ftopic5411-72.php

.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
CJ
Site Admin


Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 32196



PostPosted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

WOOHOO!!!!!  
Prez Donald Trump is considering Judge Andrew Napolitano for the U.S. Supreme Court
http://freedomlibertynews.com/tom...eplace-megyn-kelly-fox-yes-please

.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    cj.myfreeforum.org Forum Index -> America NEWS All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum